多拉·布吕代

The way he weaves personal memory with historical truth is powerful. I'm curious what drew him to this particular story and how he approached blending fact and fiction.

The narrative feels both intimate and elusive, which made me question how much is reconstructed versus remembered. How does this affect the way we perceive truth in stories like these?

The non-linear approach kept me engaged but also made me reflect on the nature of memory. I wonder if this was intended to mirror the process of historical investigation.