Wicked Beyond Belief

Understanding what motivated the author to dive into the mind of such a notorious criminal could shed light on how he approached this complex case. Was it a desire to humanize or critique the justice system?

The detailed recounting of police procedures and interviews added depth but sometimes made the narrative feel sluggish. Was this balance intentional to emphasize the investigation?

Since this is a biography that reads like a mystery, I wonder what choices were made to keep readers engaged without sacrificing truthfulness. Did the author have to omit or dramatize certain details?