The Trouble with Peace

The narrative weaves through several characters' perspectives, which kept me engaged but also a bit disorienting. I wonder what led to the decision to tell it this way—was it planned from the start or did it evolve during writing?

Many characters make questionable decisions, which adds complexity but also made me uneasy at times. How do others interpret their actions—are they justified or truly villainous?

The story delves into power struggles and corruption, but I’m curious if there’s a deeper commentary on leadership or morality that the author aimed to highlight.