How did the author decide which aspects of queer history to highlight?
Around the Web·geçen ay


Okur tartışması şimdi açık. Doğrulanmış yazar bu profili talep ettikten sonra katılabilir.
How did the author decide which aspects of queer history to highlight?
Did anyone else feel conflicted about the idea of 'normalcy' after reading this?
What inspired the author to combine philosophy and activism in this way?