Şok Doktrini: Felaket Kapitalizminin Yükselişi

The case studies and historical events make the arguments feel very tangible. I wonder what inspired the choice to organize it this way instead of a linear analysis.

The book highlights some troubling patterns, and I’m curious if others felt conflicted about the perspectives presented or the implications for those countries.

It’s eye-opening to see how disaster capitalism might influence current events. Do readers find it has changed the way they view government responses to crises?