Stephen Hawkingin Evreni

Balancing biography with complex physics must be tricky—I'm curious about what guided those choices and how they shaped the narrative.

The concepts are notoriously difficult, but this book made them feel almost intuitive. I wonder if the author used specific analogies or methods to achieve that.

Understanding the evolution of ideas adds depth, but I’m curious whether this was a deliberate choice to highlight Hawking’s contributions within the broader scientific story.