Science(ish)

I'm curious about how the author decided to blend science with film commentary. Was there a particular moment or insight that sparked this approach?

The book makes so many fascinating assertions that I kept wondering which ones are true and which are exaggerated for entertainment. Anyone else do a deep dive?

With so many films out there, it’s interesting to see the selection process. Were these movies chosen for their scientific inaccuracies, cultural impact, or personal favorites?