How did the author decide to portray the global climate crisis as a character itself?
Around the Web·geçen ay


Okur tartışması şimdi açık. Doğrulanmış yazar bu profili talep ettikten sonra katılabilir.
How did the author decide to portray the global climate crisis as a character itself?
Did anyone else find the pacing in the middle a bit slow, or was that intentional to build tension?
What do you think led to the decision to focus so heavily on scientific explanations versus character development?