JonBenet

The book offers detailed insights into the case that aren't always covered in mainstream media. I'm curious what motivated the author to explore this particular angle and how he gathered such in-depth information.

Some parts seemed to lean towards portraying the investigation as flawed or biased. I'm wondering if this was a deliberate choice or just my impression as a reader.

With so much information available, selecting what to highlight must have been challenging. I'm interested in what guided the author's focus and what was left out.