How did the author decide to frame 'Impossible Christianity' as a reassurance rather than a challenge?
Around the Web·geçen ay


Okur tartışması şimdi açık. Doğrulanmış yazar bu profili talep ettikten sonra katılabilir.
How did the author decide to frame 'Impossible Christianity' as a reassurance rather than a challenge?
Did anyone else feel relieved by the idea that following Jesus doesn't require being an expert or changing the world?
What inspired the author to emphasize spiritual failure as part of the Christian journey?