How did Jelmer Mommers decide on the most effective way to communicate climate science?
Around the Web·geçen ay


Okur tartışması şimdi açık. Doğrulanmış yazar bu profili talep ettikten sonra katılabilir.
How did Jelmer Mommers decide on the most effective way to communicate climate science?
Did anyone else feel the explanations about climate impacts were eye-opening or alarming?
What do you think led to the decision to include real-world examples rather than just data?