Good and Evil and Other Stories

Many stories leave moral questions open-ended, which made me reflect on my own perspectives. Did anyone else feel this approach heightened the suspense or confusion?

The stories feel so rooted in ordinary life, yet they evoke such unease. I'm curious whether Schweblin drew from personal experiences or broader societal fears.

Some stories felt slow and contemplative, while others moved quickly. Do you think this variation was deliberate to reflect the complexity of good and evil?