Ghost on the Throne

The period after Alexander's demise is often overlooked in favor of his conquests. I'm curious what drew attention to this pivotal war for power and its impact on history.

The book paints a complex picture of these figures, but I kept wondering whether we’re supposed to sympathize with them or see them as ruthless usurpers. What’s everyone else's take?

Ancient sources can be so biased or incomplete. I wonder what guided the author’s choices in weaving together different accounts to create a coherent narrative.