Toplumsal Cinsiyet Yanılsaması

The book references many scientific studies, some of which are quite controversial. I'm curious about the selection process and how she balanced credibility with accessibility.

While many examples were eye-opening, a few seemed to oversimplify complex issues. Did others find certain parts less convincing or too generalized?

Her approach combines science and social critique in a way that feels urgent. I wonder what personal experiences or research led her to this topic.