How did the choice to tell the story as an oral history impact the emotional depth?
Around the Web·в прошлом месяце


Обсуждение читателей уже открыто. Проверенный автор сможет присоединиться после заявления этого профиля.
How did the choice to tell the story as an oral history impact the emotional depth?
Did anyone else find the multiple perspectives added to the sense of chaos?
I wonder what led the author to focus so heavily on the aftermath rather than the outbreak itself?