Эркюль Пуаро и убийства под монограммой

The story feels so reminiscent of the classic Christie tone and pacing. I'm curious what inspired her to stay true to that voice while crafting her own narrative.

There was a lot of setup and introspection that made the story feel a bit sluggish at times. Do you think that was necessary to build suspense or could it have been tighter?

Both characters felt very true to the original stories, but I wonder if Sophie Hannah intentionally updated them for modern readers or kept them exactly as Christie did.