Синдром отката

The book presents bold ideas for geoengineering and climate tinkering. I wonder if these reflect real possibilities or are more speculative?

Stephenson’s detailed explanations can sometimes slow the pace, but they also make the world more convincing. Was this a deliberate choice to educate as well as entertain?

The interactions between nations felt very plausible but also heightened for drama. I'm curious whether real-world conflicts influenced these portrayals or if they evolved during writing.