Следы помады: Тайная история XX века

The way Greil Marcus ties together punk, avant-garde, and social upheaval is fascinating. Do readers think he had a specific narrative in mind or let the connections emerge naturally?

I loved discovering hidden histories, but some sections felt dense. Was this level of detail necessary to convey the book's broader themes or did it detract from the narrative flow?

The book makes me wonder whether the patterns of rebellion and expression from the past are still influencing us now. Do others see parallels between then and now?