Казнить нельзя помиловать

The book’s witty tone makes grammar fun, but I wonder if that was a conscious decision or just Lynne Truss's natural style. How do you think humor impacts the learning experience here?

Some examples hit close to home, which made me laugh but also reflect on my own writing habits. Is this a common reaction, or am I just guilty of a lot of comma misuses?

The book’s style is very conversational, but I’m curious about the balance between academic linguistics and humor. Did the author rely on specific sources or conventions in language study?