Хитроумный идальго Дон Кихот Ламанчский (Часть 2)

The novel balances comedy with deeper themes of idealism and disillusionment. I wonder what inspired the choice to keep it lighthearted despite the serious questions it raises.

While the first part is full of humor, the second seems more reflective and somber. What do others think about this tonal shift and its impact?

The way the characters are aware of being part of a story feels ahead of its time. I’m curious whether Cervantes intended this as a commentary on storytelling or something else.