O capital no Antropoceno

The idea of abandoning perpetual economic growth is provocative and counterintuitive. I'm curious about what motivated this perspective and how it might challenge mainstream environmental discussions.

The way the book links our economic system directly to ecological crises made me think differently about the root causes. Has this changed how others view policy or activism?

The flow from economic theory to practical environmental solutions was seamless but complex. I'm wondering if this structure was planned from the start or evolved during writing.