Traitor to His Class

The book emphasizes his political actions, but I'm curious what led to highlighting his policy shifts over personal details. Was this a deliberate choice to underscore his impact?

His upbringing was so privileged, yet he championed the underdog and social justice. How did this contrast influence perceptions of his leadership among readers?

The presidency was marked by both progressive reforms and contradictions on race. I'm interested in how this duality is explored and what insights it offers into his character.