Ziemia nie do życia. Nasza planeta po globalnym ociepleniu

The book projects possible futures based on current trends, which is a bold choice. I'm curious what led to this approach and how it influences the urgency of the message.

The book paints a very bleak picture, and I wondered if others found it hard to process or stay hopeful after reading certain chapters.

Some descriptions felt visceral and hard to forget. Did this style help make the science more relatable or did it sometimes feel too intense?