Pejzaż moralny. W jaki sposób nauka może określać wartości

His approach challenges traditional views on ethics by grounding them in neuroscience and psychology. I wonder what inspired that shift in perspective.

Harris makes a compelling case, but I’m curious whether others felt this approach truly bridges the gap between science and values or if it leaves some questions unanswered.

It’s a fascinating idea, but I wonder how feasible it is in real-world policy and cultural contexts. Would this approach be practical or overly idealistic?