Potwór z Florencji. Śledztwo w sprawie seryjnego mordercy

His investigative approach added a personal and detailed perspective. I'm curious about what drew him to this case and how he decided to structure the narrative.

The detailed recounting felt immersive but also raised questions about the balance between fact and narrative. How did the author navigate this tension?

Some parts felt very vivid while others were more summarized. I'm wondering what guided those choices and how much research went into the storytelling.