Człowiek z lodu

Understanding what drew Philip Carlo to this dark subject makes me wonder how he approached portraying such a complex, morally ambiguous figure without glamorizing him.

There were moments where I almost understood his perspective, which made me question how we perceive morality in such extreme circumstances. Was that intentional or a byproduct of storytelling?

The book feels very detailed—I'm curious about the research process and how the author navigated verifying the Ice Man's stories without compromising narrative flow.