Wtajemniczeni – nie ważcie się mówić, że to spisek

I'm curious about the research and motivations behind exposing these ideas. Was there a particular event or insight that sparked this book?

Some parts felt like they relied heavily on assumptions. I'm wondering if others found the reasoning convincing or if it raised more questions for them.

Given how much has changed since its publication, do readers think the core ideas are still relevant or have they been challenged by recent events?