Nemezis

Poirot's decision to act on his own adds a layered sense of mystery. I wonder if this was driven by the story's themes or Christie's desire to explore his character differently.

Some parts seemed to linger on details, which made me curious if that was intentional to build suspense or just a narrative choice.

The novel raises questions about justice and morality, but I’d love to hear different perspectives on whether the characters' actions felt justified or questionable.