Męska dominacja (Biblioteka Myśli Socjologicznej)

His insights into power and gender are profound, but I wonder what personal or societal factors led him to focus on masculine domination in this way.

Some case studies really hit home for me, while others felt more abstract. I'm curious which parts resonated most with different readers.

His concept of social capital seems so relevant today, especially in debates around privilege and power. Do others see parallels with current movements?