Europa. Rozprawa historyka z historią

His ability to weave together different eras and cultures into a cohesive narrative is impressive. I'm curious about what motivated him to take on this monumental task.

The ancient history parts felt so vivid and foundational, but some of the recent history was dense. Do others feel the book balances these eras well?

Europe's history is so rich that choices had to be made. I wonder what guided those editorial decisions and if some stories were intentionally left out.