Edycja genów. Władza nad ewolucją

Doudna's insights make me wonder what personal experiences or events led her to emphasize the moral questions alongside the science.

The way complex science was broken down felt impressive, but I’m curious if others felt it made the ethical stakes clearer or more daunting.

The book presents both the potential and risks so compellingly — do readers see it as a call for caution, excitement, or both?