Wij zijn nooit modern geweest

His argument that we've never truly been 'modern' made me rethink the boundaries between science, politics, and culture. Did anyone else find this perspective as provocative as I did?

His method of blending anthropology with philosophy was fascinating but also complex. I wonder what led him to develop this unique framework and how it influences current debates.

I found myself questioning the objectivity of scientific knowledge after reading. Did anyone else feel that the book made science seem more intertwined with social constructs than expected?