Naar het paradijs

The book's different versions of society made me reflect on how much history shapes identity. I wonder if the author intended to challenge our perceptions of progress.

It kept the narrative fresh but also layered. I'm curious whether this approach was planned from the outset or developed during writing, and how it affected the storytelling.

The portrayal felt both intimate and expansive. Did the author aim to highlight specific issues or to evoke empathy through these perspectives?