How did the choice to tell the story as an oral history impact the emotional depth?
Around the Web·vorige maand


De lezersdiscussie is nu open. Een geverifieerde auteur kan deelnemen nadat dit profiel is geclaimd.
How did the choice to tell the story as an oral history impact the emotional depth?
Did anyone else find the multiple perspectives added to the sense of chaos?
I wonder what led the author to focus so heavily on the aftermath rather than the outbreak itself?