De woorden en de dingen : een archeologie van de menswetenschappen

This book challenges traditional views of knowledge and meaning. I'm curious about what motivated him to develop this particular perspective and structure.

The transitions between epochs felt both dense and illuminating, but I wonder if others experienced it differently or found certain parts more accessible than others.

His critique seems to question the very foundations of knowledge. Do you think this has changed how we see the development of science and philosophy today?