Mannen, ik haat ze

The title is quite provocative and sets a strong tone—I'm curious whether it was meant to challenge readers or to spark debate from the start.

The essays mix humor with serious critique, which made me laugh but also made me uncomfortable at times. How did others interpret the balance between satire and critique?

The personal anecdotes added depth but also raised questions about how much of her own story shaped her viewpoints. I'm wondering what process she used to choose these moments.