King Kong-theorie

Her candid approach challenges societal norms and gives voice to marginalized perspectives. I'm curious about the personal experiences or ideas that fueled this work.

The book pushes boundaries and can be uncomfortable at times, but it also made me think harder about gender and power. How did others interpret her critiques?

Despentes doesn't hold back, which makes her points hit hard. Do you think this style makes her arguments more convincing or harder to digest?