Perfect: de handleiding

Michael Schur’s style is both funny and thought-provoking, but I wonder how he decided when to lean into comedy versus depth. Did anyone feel one side overshadowed the other?

Some of the moral dilemmas felt very relatable, but I’m curious if readers tried any of these 'how to' tips and how they worked out in real situations.

His background in comedy and TV shows like 'The Good Place' seems to influence his approach. I wonder how much of that was a conscious choice to make philosophy more accessible.