Intellectueel bedrog: postmodernisme, wetenschap en antiwetenschap

Understanding his motivation could shed light on whether his aim was purely academic or driven by a personal concern about the misuse of science in intellectual circles.

Some instances felt like clear misrepresentations, but I wonder if others see them as more nuanced or justified within certain academic debates.

It seems to challenge both academics and laypeople—does it succeed in making science more accessible or does it deepen skepticism about expertise?