An American Sickness

The detailed stories really brought the issues to life, but I'm curious whether these were chosen for their representativeness or impact. Did the author aim to highlight particular systemic flaws through these examples?

While the explanations are thorough, I found myself struggling to keep track of all the players and incentives. Was this intentional to mirror how complicated the system is, or could it have been simplified?

The suggestions felt practical yet ambitious — I wonder if they stem from personal experience or broader research. What do you think led to these particular solutions over others?