Adolf Hitler: Het einde van een mythe

Given the sensitivity and complexity of Hitler's life, I'm curious what inspired the author to tackle this subject in such depth. Did he aim to humanize, condemn, or understand him better?

Those sections added so much context but also made me reflect on how early experiences shape such extreme beliefs. Were there details that stood out or changed perceptions?

Balancing factual accuracy with responsible storytelling must be challenging in a biography of such a controversial figure. I wonder what choices were made to maintain objectivity.