What inspired the author to focus on non-sororic logic in this book?
Around the Web·지난달
독자 토론은 지금 열려 있습니다. 인증된 작가는 이 프로필을 신청한 뒤 참여할 수 있습니다.
What inspired the author to focus on non-sororic logic in this book?
Did anyone else find certain fallacies more relatable to everyday arguments than others?
How do you think this book changes the way we spot logical errors in media and conversations?