논리-철학논고

His unique formatting makes the work feel almost like a puzzle. I wonder if he intended it to guide readers step-by-step or to provoke multiple interpretations.

The text is famously difficult, but I felt like it forced me to slow down and really think about each statement. How do others approach these kinds of philosophical works?

Wittgenstein's work is often cited, but I'm curious about specific ways it shaped modern debates on meaning and language use. Did it inspire certain theories or methodologies?