Signature Killers

Understanding the unique aspects of signature behaviors really changed how I see serial crimes. I'm curious if this focus was driven by personal interest or specific cases.

The insights into the killers' minds added a layer of unsettling realism. I wonder if the author drew from personal interviews or case files for those details.

With so many infamous crimes, selecting which to feature must have been tough. I’d love to know if there was a particular criteria or narrative thread guiding those choices.