진실에 갇힌 남자

The moral ambiguity adds depth but also raises questions about what redemption really means. I wonder what led Baldacci to explore this theme so intensely.

The plot had such a strong start and ending, but I found the middle sections a bit slower. Do you think that was necessary to build tension or could it have been tighter?

The characters feel layered and flawed, which makes the story more compelling. I’m curious about the writing choices that helped Baldacci achieve this complexity.