타인의 증거

The narrative feels layered and intentionally fragmented, which deepens the emotional impact. I'm curious whether this was planned from the start or evolved during writing.

The sparse prose and unspoken moments seemed to carry a weight of their own. What emotions or thoughts did these silent spaces evoke for other readers?

The characters' recollections often conflict, raising questions about reliability. Did this make the story feel more authentic or more unsettling?