Crusaders

Most accounts emphasize the leaders, but I wonder what led Dan Jones to explore the stories of the ordinary soldiers and lesser-known leaders. Did these perspectives change how the history felt to him?

The intertwining of politics, religion, and personal ambition made the conflicts feel even more layered. I’d love to hear if others felt the same about the broader societal forces at play.

Given the scarcity of primary sources from the period, I’m curious about the research process and how Dan Jones balanced different accounts to create a comprehensive narrative.