돌팔이 의사

The story feels like a window into a wild, often overlooked part of American history. I wonder what led to choosing this specific figure and time period.

The way these charlatans exploited trust is disturbing but also a testament to human gullibility. How did others feel about the balance between intrigue and ethical concern?

The dual narrative added depth but also complexity. I'm curious whether this structure was planned from the start or developed during research.