What inspired the author to focus on non-sororic logic in this book?
Around the Web·先月
読者同士のディスカッションは今すぐ開かれています。認証済み著者はこのプロフィールを申請後に参加できます。
What inspired the author to focus on non-sororic logic in this book?
Did anyone else find certain fallacies more relatable to everyday arguments than others?
How do you think this book changes the way we spot logical errors in media and conversations?