リベラルたちの背信―アメリカを誤らせた民主党の60年 (Tankobon Hardcover)

The book's bold thesis makes me wonder what motivated Ann Coulter to approach these events from this particular angle. Was there a specific event or idea that sparked this perspective?

Some parts felt very black-and-white, which made me question how nuanced the actual history is. Am I the only one who sensed that some arguments might overlook important context?

The selection of examples is provocative, but I wonder what criteria she used to categorize these acts as treason. What do you think led to her choices in highlighting certain moments over others?